نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد خمین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمین، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد خمین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمین، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول)
3 استادیار ، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد خمین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمین، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Legitimacy and legality of the reason is not enough to present it to the judge, but in addition, the reason must be acquired in a legitimate and legal way; because the most important evidence in criminal event, if the legal criteria and prescribed conditions are ignored is considered invalid. In this article, it was determined by descriptive, analytical and comparative method that observing the criteria in the preparation of reports by judicial officers is very important and failure to comply with some of the principles and rules governing criminal proceedings can discredit the judicial officer's report. In Iran and England, the judicial officer is responsible for obtaining illegal evidence and may be punishable, but there are no clear provisions in Iranian law regarding the invalidity or validity of the report prepared by the bailiff through illegal means; however, with the general rule about illegal evidence, these reports should be invalidated. In England, because the prosecution must defend the presented evidence, police reports are always reviewed and the validity of the police report before the judicial authority depends on observing the legal methods in obtaining them.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)