نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، گروه الهیات، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ورامین - پیشوا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد ورامین – پیشوا، تهران. ایران (نویسنده مسئول)
3 استادیار، گروه حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ورامین - پیشوا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Guardianship over the minors until the age of puberty is the responsibility of the paternal grandfather, the guardian,trustee and ruler, and this guardianship depends on the absence of corruption and harm, compliance with the principles of life and expediency for minors, and the only thing that limits the authority of the guardian is the expediency of the minor. Therefore, in his actions and decisions, he must respect the interests and expediency of the ward. Regarding retribution and criminal crimes, this is expedient in amnesty, retribution and asking for Diya (punitive compensations). From the point of view of contemporary jurists, receiving Diya is often in the interest of the minor, but in some cases, the expedient of the minor may be in amnesty or retribution. The purpose of the research is to explain the ideas of contemporary jurists. In this research, in a descriptive and analytical way, we deal with the issue of minor's expediency from the point of view of contemporary jurists. If a child is killed as a result of an intentional or unintentional crime, the guardian has the right to retaliate ,take Diya or pardon, but if the crime against a minor is assault and battery,which causes retribution or Diya, the Islamic Penal Code is silent on this matter and according to Article 167 of the Constitution, one should refer to the famous fatwa of jurists. In the case of retribution, the guardian's right to pardon is not fixed, and regarding remission the Dyia , the guardian only has the right in the cases where it is for the minor 's benefit, not for himself. But as a result, contemporary jurists have different opinions regarding the expediency of the minor, which in this research It is analyzed.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)