The Financial Action Task Force is an independent intergovernmental body that sets standards and promotes legal, regulatory and operational enforcement to combat money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Since February 2008, this organization has put Iran's name in the list of the list under consideration and started to express its positions. Since the laws and regulations in Iran's criminal system must necessarily be compiled based on religious standards, it is must necessary to Analyze the approach of criminal jurisprudence towards the recommendations of the financial action task force. From the point of view of criminal jurisprudence, the criminalization of money laundering and the financial financing of terrorism is in accordance with the principles of jurisprudence, but in the acceptance or non-acceptance of recommendations and international conventions, the point of view of non-acceptance of non-Islamic international conventions and agreements is also a point of view. It is appropriate to examine them in the specific foundations and rules of jurisprudence. In this context, it is possible to refer to important jurisprudential rules such as negating the Domination, the principle of Expediency and Maintaining of the System. Examining jurisprudential rules shows that it is necessary to accept the recommendations of FATF. Joining the convention to fight with this financial terrorism company, examining the materials and public opinion, paying attention to the temporal and spatial requirements and internal reactions, because rules such as the negation of the mustache are variable and subject to temporal and spatial conditions and are strongly influenced by conditions and capacities.